Giant Carbon Dioxide Bubble

Watch how you can use dry ice and hot water to create an impressive Halloween party trick.

Greenpeace co-founder Patrick Moore, PhD is now “The Sensible Environmentalist,” cutting through phony “global warming” science with facts. Here, he explains why carbon dioxide (C02) is a hero, not a villain. MORE: http://www.therebel.media/patrick_moore_sensible_environmentalist_truth_about_carbon_dioxide
http://www.Facebook.com/JoinTheRebel *** http://www.Twitter.com/TheRebelTV
Video Rating: / 5

39 thoughts on “Giant Carbon Dioxide Bubble”

  1. This man is an absolute idiot. I can't even take this video seriously. Spouting out anti-science doesn't make him any more credible than Al Gore, and as he said: "Al Gore isn't a scientist."

    Reply
  2. I would love to see a debate on the subject of CO2 between Dr Moore and Al Gore on national TV to get this out on the table for the public!!

    Reply
  3. The problem; Man cannot know for sure what the global climate was like millions of years ago because no one was on earth that even knew how to measure it. The only possible person that would know for sure is God because he was there!

    Reply
  4. Great talk Patrick. It rather pisses on Al Gore's fireworks! I don't know whether you read this stuff – but if you do, I have some questions.

    I understand that rising temperatures appear to drive increased levels of CO2 in the atmosphere – NOT the other way around (i.e. the 800-year lag point), but:

    (1) Why is this? AND

    (2) Why has there been such a strong correlation between temperatures and CO2 levels over more recent times when there appeared to be no correlation (you even pointed out a couple of examples of inverse correlation) over the longer term?

    Further questions:

    (3) Why has the level of CO2 in the atmosphere been on such a persistent decline for so long?

    (4) Is it overstatement to argue that human emissions are saving the world rather than simply mitigating this CO2-level decline?

    Reply
  5. Gore was awarded the position of global warming spokesman from the globalists after he lost the election. Gore is one of them. He had a horrible nervous breakdown. He faked being a college professor. He showed up the first and last day of class. He was videoed taped by the media. It was fake. He never taught the class. The kids were told that if they told anyone, they'd be expelled. Boy, that's abuse, huh?
    Gores wife and children were shocked at him. He did indeed lose his mind. He was promised the presidency. The Bushes have a much longer and deeper relationship with the powers that be. GW was awarded the top spot (if these ideas are new to you, please begin by studying both families).
    Gore has a new, young wife who is a globalist. He now has a worth of over one billion dollars. Follow the money. Look at the facts. Global warming is a ruse. They changed the causes name to climate change to cover themselves for dips in the temperature when it gets colder!
    By the way, did you know that in the late 1970's the idea of global cooling was being pushed on us by the liberal community. They were very serious. We were told that by the very late 70s a new ice age would cover half of the US with ice! By the late 70,s two scientists made up the idea that the world was heating up. They held press conferences in Washing DC. Few attended. But even one article was worth gold as it helped them get big tax dollars to research global warming. After a few rich years of this, they admitted that it had all been made up by them. TIME magazine reported on this con job.
    I realize that if you believe and speak the truth about this you will be viciously attacked and your reputation will be ruined. You will be shunned and called ever name in the book! If you are in school, your grades will drop! You know that will happen. Yes, you well know what they do to those who speak the obvious truth.
    That should really tell you something.

    Reply
  6. I really want to be behind Dr. Moore but I just can't. There is no question that the oceans are acidifying, there is no question that animals are changing their migratory patterns at an unseen rate, there is no question that our earth's ecosystem is changing. Yes, Carbon is not our enemy, it has never been. Those who spout that nonsense are not educated in basic biology. There is no doubt there is variability, there is no doubt that humans carbon impact is minuscule to the natural carbon cycle of the earth. However, we are breaking solidified carbon material up and then putting it into a gaseous state in our atmosphere. OF COURSE, something is going to happen!? Where is all the CO2 going? You can bet that the C3 plants aren't harnessing all the extra CO2. It's not logical, the simplest answer is usually the right one. A number of presentations I have seen of climatologists jump through hoops and use confirmation bias to push their viewpoints is disappointing. This isn't the scientific method.

    Reply
  7. He conflates too many non-associated "facts." And attempts to put them in opposition. Not good thinking. Is CO2 good? Yes. Is as much as humans are putting into the atmosphere good? No. Analysis of 1 million years of ice core layers is clear that the current few hundred years are unprecedented with respect to CO2 concentrations in the air and oceans.Humans have accelerated a natural process; an interglacial period.. The ice caps and glaciers have been and are melting. Humans have helped them melt faster. Fresh water is fast becoming unavailable. And guys like him spewing this crap are not helping us get ready for the consequences: war, war, war,..

    Reply
  8. global warming or not. I like fresh air in cities, makes it easier to visit. Nature without trash and pollution. Is Moore a scientist?

    Reply
  9. Thanks Rebel Media. We finally have a voice that shows some facts instead of telepromptor read drivel spewing the same factless brainwashing material.

    Reply
  10. Al is  now asking for 15 trillion to combat global warming. Not sure how that stops anything. Now if we could put the global warming behind us, and focus on dealing with the upcoming grand solar minimum, and 4 other factors happening at the same time, which will lower global temps somewhere between -2 to -4 degrees. -2 degrees would mean a 25% depopulation, -4 degrees would mean up to a 75% depopulation which i'm starting to believe is their ultimate goal.

    Reply
  11. 7:21 There is a big difference between a difference of 12 degrees since the the paleocene and a difference of 2 degrees in a human lifetime. What people are concerned about is the rate of change. If you were to assume the rate stayed the same (which I agree wouldn't be fair to do as there are far more factors to consider) that rise would be much, much bigger if you take it over the same amount of time.

    You can't simply compare time that allows for significant and noticeable evolution, adaptation and migration, to the time of 3 or so generations.

    Reply
  12. CO2 is required for life, so is N2, therefore we should pump as much nitrogen into the air as possible! No one is against CO2 being in the atmosphere, everyone agrees it's essential for life, but that's not what anyone's arguing over. Pumping up fossil fuels breaks the carbon cycle by introducing CO2 into the system far more quickly than it is taken out of the system, that's what people have a problem with.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to sam4malaysia Cancel reply

three − one =