Monsanto Bought Favorable Science & Ghostwrote For EPA

Read More At:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/monsanto-employee-emails-show-efforts-to-marshal-scientists-1501783310

Support The Show On Patreon:
https://www.patreon.com/seculartalk

Here’s Our Amazon Link:
https://www.amazon.com/?tag=seculacom-20

Follow Kyle on Twitter:
http://www.#/kylekulinski

Like the show on Facebook:
http://www. FACEBOOK /SecularTalk

Clip from The Kyle Kulinski Show, which airs live on Blog Talk Radio and Secular Talk Radio Monday – Friday 11:00 AM – 12:30 PM Eastern time zone.

Listen to the Live Show or On Demand archive at:
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/kylekulinski

Check out our website – and become a member – at:
http://www.SecularTalkRadio.com
Video Rating: / 5

20 thoughts on “Monsanto Bought Favorable Science & Ghostwrote For EPA”

  1. To those of you who think that this proves that GMO crops are bad for you, NO IT DOES NOT. Here's the solution; just choose a different herbicide and genetically engineer your crop to be resistant to it.

    Reply
  2. Policyed commercial advertising kicking old people off of Medicare and privatizing Medicaid as if those are good ideas. These companies are sick. I wonder who they think they're convincing by advertising on Kyle's channel.

    Reply
  3. Monsanto is evil and I love that you're covering this Kyle. I feel like the video could have been a little more focused/on topic though. You kinda went into the weeds making comparisons to smoking and stuff rather than just being detailed about the story.

    Reply
  4. Wording is not some conspiracy, there are multiple subtances that we are not sure cause cancer this is not some exeception- it's not certain in some cases and there are problems with checking out for obvious reasons. Also EPA does not have its direct european counterpart. Not saying this doesn't stink but I don't think Kyle knows what he is talking about here.

    Reply
  5. Monsanto paying for internet trolls, confirmed. The thing that's so hilarious about these twatwaffles is they're doing the very thing described in the segment. My favorite line is, "I really like you Kyle, but". Their profiles look exactly like the Hillary troll profiles. Is there like a 1 800 troll4u line, or something?

    Reply
  6. "Monsanto Bought Favorable Science & Ghostwrote For EPA" and yet on this progressive YouTube channel, the comments are full of people DEFENDING Monsanto. They ignore the corruption angle clearly presented in the title and focus on using buzzterms like "anti-science". It isn't science when you buy off your regulators. It is called "regulatory capture".

    Reply
  7. Damnit Kyle. I like you, but every now and then you go off the rails. Please don't contribute to this fear mongering nonsense. These anti-science fear mongers are already annoying enough to fight.

    Reply
  8. Oh shit, this comment section seems like a toxic mess. I'm pro-GMOs, but that doesn't mean that everything this company does is honest and ethical by definition. It sounds like they're being corrupt, whether or not their product is dangerous. I guess we'll find out. Let's not fall into that trap of letting greedy capitalist corporations pull their "Silicon Valley" trick; they try to be friends with us by bombarding us with pseudo liberal sounding garbage about scientific progress, the future, and "a new world of technological globalization". It's nothing but Fortune 500 business moguls trying to gentrify the left with iPhone-hipster imagery, so that they can replace populist policy with vague globalist sounding platitudes and have their CEOs be given prominent government positions. Is Mark Zuckerberg running for president ? That makes him a goddamn corporatist no matter how socially left wing he acts. This breed is nothing but the hip LA version of the Koch brothers.

    Reply
  9. reading all the "glyophospate" monsanto troll stuff below makes me always wonder who first got the idea the putting something on plants or bugs that kills them is somehow ok for the food chain that culminates in stuff I eat. I think only paid shills or farmers who don't want to believe the stuff they use could be harmful argue for the safety of widespread toxic chemical use.

    Reply
  10. Remember when Kyle Kulinski maligned those who opposed Monsanto's genetically modified organisms? Yeah how's that going Kyle(?)

    Reply
  11. What about the possibility that an anti-GMO group is paying to have the studies made that say it causes cancer…

    Reply
  12. It's all about "creating doubt." Pretty great documentary called "Merchants of doubt" that shows just how the bread is buttered for big corporations like this.And how a small number of people are actually behind the smokescreen of carefully worded, well choreographed deception.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to DirtyOldJoe Cancel reply

eighteen + nine =